<para>
Another note is that this callback is non-atomic
- (schedulable). This is important, because the
+ (schedulable) as default, i.e. when no
+ <structfield>nonatomic</structfield> flag set.
+ This is important, because the
<structfield>trigger</structfield> callback
is atomic (non-schedulable). That is, mutexes or any
schedule-related functions are not available in
</para>
<para>
- As mentioned, this callback is atomic. You cannot call
- functions which may sleep.
+ As mentioned, this callback is atomic as default unless
+ <structfield>nonatomic</structfield> flag set, and
+ you cannot call functions which may sleep.
The trigger callback should be as minimal as possible,
just really triggering the DMA. The other stuff should be
initialized hw_params and prepare callbacks properly
</para>
<para>
- This callback is also atomic.
+ This callback is also atomic as default.
</para>
</section>
is useful only for such a purpose.
</para>
<para>
- This callback is atomic.
+ This callback is atomic as default.
</para>
</section>
called with local interrupts disabled.
</para>
+ <para>
+ The recent changes in PCM core code, however, allow all PCM
+ operations to be non-atomic. This assumes that the all caller
+ sides are in non-atomic contexts. For example, the function
+ <function>snd_pcm_period_elapsed()</function> is called
+ typically from the interrupt handler. But, if you set up the
+ driver to use a threaded interrupt handler, this call can be in
+ non-atomic context, too. In such a case, you can set
+ <structfield>nonatomic</structfield> filed of
+ <structname>snd_pcm</structname> object after creating it.
+ When this flag is set, mutex and rwsem are used internally in
+ the PCM core instead of spin and rwlocks, so that you can call
+ all PCM functions safely in a non-atomic context.
+ </para>
+
</section>
<section id="pcm-interface-constraints">
<title>Constraints</title>