seccomp: Adjust selftests to avoid double-join

While glibc's pthread implementation is rather forgiving about repeat
thread joining, Bionic has recently become much more strict. To deal with
this, actually track which threads have been successfully joined and kill
the rest at teardown.

Based on a patch from Paul Lawrence.

Cc: Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 03f1fa495d743f4bb9032486eb42f201a33bc01d..00a928b833d02d3f50dced58005a55d93c5e7e5a 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1822,6 +1822,23 @@ struct tsync_sibling {
        struct __test_metadata *metadata;
 };
 
+/*
+ * To avoid joining joined threads (which is not allowed by Bionic),
+ * make sure we both successfully join and clear the tid to skip a
+ * later join attempt during fixture teardown. Any remaining threads
+ * will be directly killed during teardown.
+ */
+#define PTHREAD_JOIN(tid, status)                                      \
+       do {                                                            \
+               int _rc = pthread_join(tid, status);                    \
+               if (_rc) {                                              \
+                       TH_LOG("pthread_join of tid %u failed: %d\n",   \
+                               (unsigned int)tid, _rc);                \
+               } else {                                                \
+                       tid = 0;                                        \
+               }                                                       \
+       } while (0)
+
 FIXTURE_DATA(TSYNC) {
        struct sock_fprog root_prog, apply_prog;
        struct tsync_sibling sibling[TSYNC_SIBLINGS];
@@ -1890,14 +1907,14 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(TSYNC)
 
        for ( ; sib < self->sibling_count; ++sib) {
                struct tsync_sibling *s = &self->sibling[sib];
-               void *status;
 
                if (!s->tid)
                        continue;
-               if (pthread_kill(s->tid, 0)) {
-                       pthread_cancel(s->tid);
-                       pthread_join(s->tid, &status);
-               }
+               /*
+                * If a thread is still running, it may be stuck, so hit
+                * it over the head really hard.
+                */
+               pthread_kill(s->tid, 9);
        }
        pthread_mutex_destroy(&self->mutex);
        pthread_cond_destroy(&self->cond);
@@ -1987,9 +2004,9 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, siblings_fail_prctl)
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
 
        /* Ensure diverging sibling failed to call prctl. */
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE, (long)status);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
 }
 
@@ -2029,9 +2046,9 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_ancestor)
        }
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
        /* Ensure they are both killed and don't exit cleanly. */
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(0x0, (long)status);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(0x0, (long)status);
 }
 
@@ -2055,9 +2072,9 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_sibling_want_nnp)
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
 
        /* Ensure they are both upset about lacking nnp. */
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_NEWPRIVS, (long)status);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_NEWPRIVS, (long)status);
 }
 
@@ -2095,9 +2112,9 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_no_filter)
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
 
        /* Ensure they are both killed and don't exit cleanly. */
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(0x0, (long)status);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(0x0, (long)status);
 }
 
@@ -2140,9 +2157,9 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence)
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
 
        /* Ensure they are both unkilled. */
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
 }
 
@@ -2199,7 +2216,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
                TH_LOG("cond broadcast non-zero");
        }
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[sib].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[sib].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
        /* Poll for actual task death. pthread_join doesn't guarantee it. */
        while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0))
@@ -2224,7 +2241,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
                TH_LOG("cond broadcast non-zero");
        }
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
-       pthread_join(self->sibling[sib].tid, &status);
+       PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[sib].tid, &status);
        EXPECT_EQ(0, (long)status);
        /* Poll for actual task death. pthread_join doesn't guarantee it. */
        while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0))