The macro for_each_memcg_cache_index contains a silly yet potentially
deadly mistake. Although the macro parameter is _idx, the loop tests
are done over i, not _idx.
This hasn't generated any problems so far, because all users use i as a
loop index. However, while playing with an extension of the code I
ended using another loop index and the compiler was quick to complain.
Unfortunately, this is not the kind of thing that testing reveals =(
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* the slab_mutex must be held when looping through those caches
*/
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
- for ((_idx) = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; (_idx)++)
+ for ((_idx) = 0; (_idx) < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; (_idx)++)
static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
{