mm: nobootmem: move the comment of free_all_bootmem

Commit b4def3509d18 ("mm, nobootmem: clean-up of free_low_memory_core_early()")
removed the unnecessary nodeid argument, after that, this comment
becomes more confused.  We should move it to the right place.

Fixes: b4def3509d18c1db9 ("mm, nobootmem: clean-up of free_low_memory_core_early()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473996082-14603-1-git-send-email-wanlong.gao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index 490d46abddad2732346465befa7a3349bccc9e75..ba609b684d7a889ee00c7edd281e8458e926e5ad 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ static unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(void)
        for_each_reserved_mem_region(i, &start, &end)
                reserve_bootmem_region(start, end);
 
+       /*
+        * We need to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of NODE_DATA(0)->node_id
+        *  because in some case like Node0 doesn't have RAM installed
+        *  low ram will be on Node1
+        */
        for_each_free_mem_range(i, NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &start, &end,
                                NULL)
                count += __free_memory_core(start, end);
@@ -194,11 +199,6 @@ unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem(void)
 
        reset_all_zones_managed_pages();
 
-       /*
-        * We need to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of NODE_DATA(0)->node_id
-        *  because in some case like Node0 doesn't have RAM installed
-        *  low ram will be on Node1
-        */
        pages = free_low_memory_core_early();
        totalram_pages += pages;