[PATCH] knfsd: svcrpc: use consistent variable name for the reply state
authorJ.Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:16:08 +0000 (02:16 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:55:19 +0000 (07:55 -0700)
The rpc reply has multiple levels of error returns.  The code here contributes
to the confusion by using "accept_statp" for a pointer to what the rfc (and
wireshark, etc.) refer to as the "reply_stat".  (The confusion is compounded
by the fact that the rfc also has an "accept_stat" which follows the
reply_stat in the succesful case.)

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
net/sunrpc/svc.c

index 550441d13a081fc9566acd0f71fcb15a1d37d54d..c2c8bb20d07f7171aad6a74e9c4cf323fd4f03ca 100644 (file)
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
        u32                     dir, prog, vers, proc;
        __be32                  auth_stat, rpc_stat;
        int                     auth_res;
-       __be32                  *accept_statp;
+       __be32                  *reply_statp;
 
        rpc_stat = rpc_success;
 
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
                goto err_bad_rpc;
 
        /* Save position in case we later decide to reject: */
-       accept_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
+       reply_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len;
 
        svc_putnl(resv, 0);             /* ACCEPT */
 
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ err_bad_auth:
        dprintk("svc: authentication failed (%d)\n", ntohl(auth_stat));
        serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++;
        /* Restore write pointer to location of accept status: */
-       xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, accept_statp);
+       xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, reply_statp);
        svc_putnl(resv, 1);     /* REJECT */
        svc_putnl(resv, 1);     /* AUTH_ERROR */
        svc_putnl(resv, ntohl(auth_stat));      /* status */