cifs: avoid unused variable and label

The newly introduced cifs_clone_file_range() function produces
two harmless compile-time warnings:

cifsfs.c: In function 'cifs_clone_file_range':
cifsfs.c:963:1: warning: label 'out_unlock' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
cifsfs.c:924:20: warning: unused variable 'src_tcon' [-Wunused-variable]

In both cases, removing the extraneous line avoids the warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: c6f2a1e2e5f8 ("vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index e9b978f2e11481b0a8f2a98154d3f39d9c2ec53d..fd3643451dd5606788825312af8e5735f8718aae 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
        struct inode *target_inode = file_inode(dst_file);
        struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_src = src_file->private_data;
        struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data;
-       struct cifs_tcon *src_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_src->tlink);
        struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink);
        unsigned int xid;
        int rc;
@@ -960,7 +959,6 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
        /* force revalidate of size and timestamps of target file now
           that target is updated on the server */
        CIFS_I(target_inode)->time = 0;
-out_unlock:
        /* although unlocking in the reverse order from locking is not
           strictly necessary here it is a little cleaner to be consistent */
        unlock_two_nondirectories(src_inode, target_inode);