dcbml_setnumtcs wasn't checking for the presence of the setnumtcs
function. Instead, it was checking for setstate which was a bug.
Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W Multanen <eric.w.multanen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
u8 value;
int i;
- if (!tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS] || !netdev->dcbnl_ops->setstate)
+ if (!tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS] || !netdev->dcbnl_ops->setnumtcs)
return ret;
ret = nla_parse_nested(data, DCB_NUMTCS_ATTR_MAX, tb[DCB_ATTR_NUMTCS],