arm64: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess speculation
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:11:01 +0000 (12:11 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fri, 20 Apr 2018 06:20:42 +0000 (08:20 +0200)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

commit 4d8efc2d5ee4c9ccfeb29ee8afd47a8660d0c0ce upstream.

Similarly to x86, mitigate speculation past an access_ok() check by
masking the pointer against the address limit before use.

Even if we don't expect speculative writes per se, it is plausible that
a CPU may still speculate at least as far as fetching a cache line for
writing, hence we also harden put_user() and clear_user() for peace of
mind.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h

index 0f05ba51531c5dfe3187823027bf69d200f551db..a9db051b967ff21ba568452408a7fbf710e6b61d 100644 (file)
@@ -128,6 +128,26 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
        "       .long           (" #from " - .), (" #to " - .)\n"       \
        "       .popsection\n"
 
+/*
+ * Sanitise a uaccess pointer such that it becomes NULL if above the
+ * current addr_limit.
+ */
+#define uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr) (__typeof__(ptr))__uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr)
+static inline void __user *__uaccess_mask_ptr(const void __user *ptr)
+{
+       void __user *safe_ptr;
+
+       asm volatile(
+       "       bics    xzr, %1, %2\n"
+       "       csel    %0, %1, xzr, eq\n"
+       : "=&r" (safe_ptr)
+       : "r" (ptr), "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
+       : "cc");
+
+       csdb();
+       return safe_ptr;
+}
+
 /*
  * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions do not verify the address
  * space - it must have been done previously with a separate "access_ok()"
@@ -202,7 +222,7 @@ do {                                                                        \
        __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr);                         \
        might_fault();                                                  \
        access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ?                     \
-               __get_user((x), __p) :                                  \
+               __p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __get_user((x), __p) :     \
                ((x) = 0, -EFAULT);                                     \
 })
 
@@ -270,7 +290,7 @@ do {                                                                        \
        __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr);                         \
        might_fault();                                                  \
        access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ?                    \
-               __put_user((x), __p) :                                  \
+               __p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __put_user((x), __p) :     \
                -EFAULT;                                                \
 })
 
@@ -331,7 +351,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_in_user(void __user *to, const voi
 static inline unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
 {
        if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
-               n = __clear_user(to, n);
+               n = __clear_user(__uaccess_mask_ptr(to), n);
        return n;
 }