This has not yet been observed, but conceivably, when using GFP_KERNEL
allocations from drbd_md_sync(), drbd_flush_after_epoch() or
receive_SyncParam(), we could trigger additional IO to our own device,
or an other device in a criss-cross setup, and end up in a local
deadlock, or potentially a distributed deadlock in a criss-cross setup
involving the peer blocked in a similar way waiting for us to make
progress.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
if (test_bit(MD_NO_FUA, &mdev->flags))
return;
- r = blkdev_issue_flush(mdev->ldev->md_bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
+ r = blkdev_issue_flush(mdev->ldev->md_bdev, GFP_NOIO, NULL);
if (r) {
set_bit(MD_NO_FUA, &mdev->flags);
dev_err(DEV, "meta data flush failed with status %d, disabling md-flushes\n", r);
{
struct fifo_buffer *fb;
- fb = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fifo_buffer) + sizeof(int) * fifo_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ fb = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fifo_buffer) + sizeof(int) * fifo_size, GFP_NOIO);
if (!fb)
return NULL;