ppp: don't set sk_state to PPPOX_ZOMBIE in pppoe_disc_rcv()
authorGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:52:56 +0000 (12:52 +0100)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:31:26 +0000 (11:31 -0500)
Since 287f3a943fef ("pppoe: Use workqueue to die properly when a PADT
is received"), pppoe_disc_rcv() disconnects the socket by scheduling
pppoe_unbind_sock_work(). This is enough to stop socket transmission
and makes the PPPOX_ZOMBIE state uncessary.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c

index 5e0b43283bce2c4f5251e5c5db982ca679526d07..1dedfbf1d423fdb7aac8aabd99c4fcd98a8a3360 100644 (file)
@@ -500,27 +500,9 @@ static int pppoe_disc_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 
        pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev));
        po = get_item(pn, ph->sid, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, dev->ifindex);
-       if (po) {
-               struct sock *sk = sk_pppox(po);
-
-               bh_lock_sock(sk);
-
-               /* If the user has locked the socket, just ignore
-                * the packet.  With the way two rcv protocols hook into
-                * one socket family type, we cannot (easily) distinguish
-                * what kind of SKB it is during backlog rcv.
-                */
-               if (sock_owned_by_user(sk) == 0) {
-                       /* We're no longer connect at the PPPOE layer,
-                        * and must wait for ppp channel to disconnect us.
-                        */
-                       sk->sk_state = PPPOX_ZOMBIE;
-               }
-
-               bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+       if (po)
                if (!schedule_work(&po->proto.pppoe.padt_work))
-                       sock_put(sk);
-       }
+                       sock_put(sk_pppox(po));
 
 abort:
        kfree_skb(skb);