drm/i915: GMBUS don't need no forcewake
authorVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:44:47 +0000 (14:44 +0300)
committerVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:26:42 +0000 (14:26 +0300)
GMBUS is part of the display engine, and thus has no need for
forcewake. Let's not bother trying to grab it then.

I don't recall if the display engine suffers from system hangs
due to multiple accesses to the same "cacheline" in mmio space.
I hope not since we're no longer protected by the uncore lock
since commit 4e6c2d58ba86 ("drm/i915: Take forcewake once for
the entire GMBUS transaction")

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476272687-15070-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c

index d04185e1edd6ea8dfc50d605abcb7ab39e1824a9..83f260bb4eefe59156adedd663901ba2d14d73cc 100644 (file)
@@ -467,13 +467,9 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
                                               struct intel_gmbus,
                                               adapter);
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv;
-       const unsigned int fw =
-               intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, GMBUS0,
-                                              FW_REG_READ | FW_REG_WRITE);
        int i = 0, inc, try = 0;
        int ret = 0;
 
-       intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, fw);
 retry:
        I915_WRITE_FW(GMBUS0, bus->reg0);
 
@@ -575,7 +571,6 @@ timeout:
        ret = -EAGAIN;
 
 out:
-       intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, fw);
        return ret;
 }