uprobes: Rationalize the usage of filter_chain()

filter_chain() was added into install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint to
simplify the initial changes but this is sub-optimal.

This patch shifts the callsite to the callers, register_for_each_vma()
and uprobe_mmap(). This way:

- It will be easier to add the new arguments. This is the main reason,
  we can do more optimizations later.

- register_for_each_vma(is_register => true) can be optimized, we only
  need to consult the new consumer. The previous consumers were already
  asked when they called uprobe_register().

This patch also moves the MMF_HAS_UPROBES check from remove_breakpoint(),
this allows to avoid the potentionally costly filter_chain(). Note that
register_for_each_vma(is_register => false) doesn't really need to take
->consumer_rwsem, but I don't think it makes sense to optimize this and
introduce filter_chain_lockless().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index c3b65d1c8443e28b79c547ec4364abc4b4628b40..33912086d54ef1fd80b8c232a1a6bb3406a40fc0 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -579,6 +579,11 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
        return ret;
 }
 
+static inline bool consumer_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+{
+       return true; /* TODO: !uc->filter || uc->filter(...) */
+}
+
 static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe)
 {
        struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
@@ -586,8 +591,7 @@ static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe)
 
        down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
        for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
-               /* TODO: ret = uc->filter(...) */
-               ret = true;
+               ret = consumer_filter(uc);
                if (ret)
                        break;
        }
@@ -603,15 +607,6 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
        bool first_uprobe;
        int ret;
 
-       /*
-        * If probe is being deleted, unregister thread could be done with
-        * the vma-rmap-walk through. Adding a probe now can be fatal since
-        * nobody will be able to cleanup. But in this case filter_chain()
-        * must return false, all consumers have gone away.
-        */
-       if (!filter_chain(uprobe))
-               return 0;
-
        ret = prepare_uprobe(uprobe, vma->vm_file, mm, vaddr);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
@@ -636,12 +631,6 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
 static int
 remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
 {
-       if (!test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags))
-               return 0;
-
-       if (filter_chain(uprobe))
-               return 0;
-
        set_bit(MMF_RECALC_UPROBES, &mm->flags);
        return set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr);
 }
@@ -781,10 +770,14 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
                    vaddr_to_offset(vma, info->vaddr) != uprobe->offset)
                        goto unlock;
 
-               if (is_register)
-                       err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
-               else
-                       err |= remove_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, info->vaddr);
+               if (is_register) {
+                       /* consult only the "caller", new consumer. */
+                       if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers))
+                               err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
+               } else if (test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags)) {
+                       if (!filter_chain(uprobe))
+                               err |= remove_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, info->vaddr);
+               }
 
  unlock:
                up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -968,9 +961,14 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 
        mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
        build_probe_list(inode, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, &tmp_list);
-
+       /*
+        * We can race with uprobe_unregister(), this uprobe can be already
+        * removed. But in this case filter_chain() must return false, all
+        * consumers have gone away.
+        */
        list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
-               if (!fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+               if (!fatal_signal_pending(current) &&
+                   filter_chain(uprobe)) {
                        unsigned long vaddr = offset_to_vaddr(vma, uprobe->offset);
                        install_breakpoint(uprobe, vma->vm_mm, vma, vaddr);
                }