This was harmless, but for the case of a device that had no irq
pre-defined we would incorrectly suggest that "usepirqmask" might make a
difference. It never would, and the message was just confusing people.
Reported in the dmesg of Etienne Lorrain.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* reported by the device if possible.
*/
newirq = dev->irq;
- if (!((1 << newirq) & mask)) {
+ if (newirq && !((1 << newirq) & mask)) {
if ( pci_probe & PCI_USE_PIRQ_MASK) newirq = 0;
else printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: IRQ %i for device %s doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask\n", newirq, pci_name(dev));
}