Obviously in the current place the 'else' keyword is redundant, though it seems
quite correct when we check if nval is in allowed range.
Reattach the condition branch there.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
if (!val)
return obj->package.count;
- else if (nval <= 0)
- return -EINVAL;
if (nval > obj->package.count)
return -EOVERFLOW;
+ else if (nval <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
items = obj->package.elements;
+
switch (proptype) {
case DEV_PROP_U8:
ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u8(items, (u8 *)val, nval);