We never store the "master" type of STKs since we request encryption
directly with them so we only need one STK type (the one that's
looked-up on the slave side). Simply remove the unnecessary define and
rename the _SLAVE one to the shorter form.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
#define HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P256 0x08
/* The spec doesn't define types for SMP keys, the _MASTER suffix is implied */
#define HCI_SMP_STK 0x80
-#define HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE 0x81
#define HCI_SMP_LTK 0x82
#define HCI_SMP_LTK_SLAVE 0x83
* distribute the keys. Later, security can be re-established
* using a distributed LTK.
*/
- if (ltk->type == HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE) {
+ if (ltk->type == HCI_SMP_STK) {
list_del(<k->list);
kfree(ltk);
}
else
auth = 0;
+ /* Even though there's no _SLAVE suffix this is the
+ * slave STK we're adding for later lookup (the master
+ * STK never needs to be stored).
+ */
hci_add_ltk(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
- HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size,
+ HCI_SMP_STK, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size,
ediv, rand);
}