ret is still -1, if during the polling read_byte() returns at once
with I2C_PCA_CON_SI set. So ret > 0 would lead *_waitforcompletion()
to return 0, in spite of the proper behavior.
The routine was rewritten, so that ret has always a proper value,
before returning.
Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
static int pca_isa_waitforcompletion(void *pd)
{
- long ret = ~0;
unsigned long timeout;
+ long ret;
if (irq > -1) {
ret = wait_event_timeout(pca_wait,
} else {
/* Do polling */
timeout = jiffies + pca_isa_ops.timeout;
- while (((pca_isa_readbyte(pd, I2C_PCA_CON)
- & I2C_PCA_CON_SI) == 0)
- && (ret = time_before(jiffies, timeout)))
+ do {
+ ret = time_before(jiffies, timeout);
+ if (pca_isa_readbyte(pd, I2C_PCA_CON)
+ & I2C_PCA_CON_SI)
+ break;
udelay(100);
+ } while (ret);
}
+
return ret > 0;
}
static int i2c_pca_pf_waitforcompletion(void *pd)
{
struct i2c_pca_pf_data *i2c = pd;
- long ret = ~0;
unsigned long timeout;
+ long ret;
if (i2c->irq) {
ret = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait,
} else {
/* Do polling */
timeout = jiffies + i2c->adap.timeout;
- while (((i2c->algo_data.read_byte(i2c, I2C_PCA_CON)
- & I2C_PCA_CON_SI) == 0)
- && (ret = time_before(jiffies, timeout)))
+ do {
+ ret = time_before(jiffies, timeout);
+ if (i2c->algo_data.read_byte(i2c, I2C_PCA_CON)
+ & I2C_PCA_CON_SI)
+ break;
udelay(100);
+ } while (ret);
}
return ret > 0;