ROSE: AX25: finding routes simplification
authorBernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:33:49 +0000 (13:33 -0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:33:49 +0000 (13:33 -0800)
With previous patch, rose_get_neigh() routine
investigates the full list of neighbor nodes
until it finds or not an already connected node whether
it is called locally or through a level 3 transit frame.
If no routes are opened through an adjacent connected node
then a classical connect request is attempted.

Then there is no more reason for an extra loop such
as the one removed by this patch.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/rose/af_rose.c

index d952e7eac18867501a0bf7d2034c621c2fd08df7..5ee0c62046a03d0d17c4abe78782fd7e7f07c9c5 100644 (file)
@@ -803,7 +803,6 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_le
 
                rose_insert_socket(sk);         /* Finish the bind */
        }
-rose_try_next_neigh:
        rose->dest_addr   = addr->srose_addr;
        rose->dest_call   = addr->srose_call;
        rose->rand        = ((long)rose & 0xFFFF) + rose->lci;
@@ -865,12 +864,6 @@ rose_try_next_neigh:
        }
 
        if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
-       /* Try next neighbour */
-               rose->neighbour = rose_get_neigh(&addr->srose_addr, &cause, &diagnostic, 0);
-               if (rose->neighbour)
-                       goto rose_try_next_neigh;
-
-               /* No more neighbours */
                sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
                err = sock_error(sk);   /* Always set at this point */
                goto out_release;