This will support a upcoming request where two related values need to be
updated atomically.
This was done without a union in the OrangeFS server source already. Since
that will break the kernel protocol, it has been fixed there and done here
in a way that does not break the kernel protocol.
Signed-off-by: Martin Brandenburg <martin@omnibond.com>
};
struct orangefs_param_response {
- __s64 value;
+ union {
+ __s64 value64;
+ __s32 value32[2];
+ } u;
};
#define PERF_COUNT_BUF_SIZE 4096
out:
if (!rc) {
if (strcmp(kobj_id, PC_KOBJ_ID)) {
- rc = scnprintf(buf,
- PAGE_SIZE,
- "%d\n",
- (int)new_op->downcall.resp.param.value);
+ rc = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
+ (int)new_op->downcall.resp.param.u.value64);
} else {
rc = scnprintf(
buf,
new_op->upcall.req.param.type = ORANGEFS_PARAM_REQUEST_SET;
- new_op->upcall.req.param.value = val;
+ new_op->upcall.req.param.u.value64 = val;
/*
* The service_operation will return a errno return code on
struct orangefs_param_request_s {
enum orangefs_param_request_type type;
enum orangefs_param_request_op op;
- __s64 value;
+ union {
+ __s64 value64;
+ __s32 value32[2];
+ } u;
char s_value[ORANGEFS_MAX_DEBUG_STRING_LEN];
};