Instead of operating over a register we need to put back
into normal state afterwards (the memory position), just
sub from rbx, which is trashed anyway. We can save a few instructions.
Also, this is the i386 way.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
ENTRY(__put_user_2)
CFI_STARTPROC
GET_THREAD_INFO(%rbx)
- addq $1,%rcx
- jc 20f
- cmpq TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rcx
- jae 20f
- decq %rcx
+ mov TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rbx
+ sub $1, %rbx
+ cmpq %rbx ,%rcx
+ jae bad_put_user
2: movw %ax,(%rcx)
xorl %eax,%eax
ret
-20: decq %rcx
- jmp bad_put_user
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(__put_user_2)
ENTRY(__put_user_4)
CFI_STARTPROC
GET_THREAD_INFO(%rbx)
- addq $3,%rcx
- jc 30f
- cmpq TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rcx
- jae 30f
- subq $3,%rcx
+ mov TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rbx
+ sub $3, %rbx
+ cmp %rbx, %rcx
+ jae bad_put_user
3: movl %eax,(%rcx)
xorl %eax,%eax
ret
-30: subq $3,%rcx
- jmp bad_put_user
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(__put_user_4)
ENTRY(__put_user_8)
CFI_STARTPROC
GET_THREAD_INFO(%rbx)
- addq $7,%rcx
- jc 40f
- cmpq TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rcx
- jae 40f
- subq $7,%rcx
+ mov TI_addr_limit(%rbx),%rbx
+ sub $7, %rbx
+ cmp %rbx, %rcx
+ jae bad_put_user
4: movq %rax,(%rcx)
xorl %eax,%eax
ret
-40: subq $7,%rcx
- jmp bad_put_user
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(__put_user_8)