The existing overflow check (n > ULONG_MAX / b) didn't work, because
n = ULONG_MAX / b would both bypass the check and still overflow the
allocation size a + n * b.
The correct check should be (n > (ULONG_MAX - a) / b).
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, yes, bad);
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
err = -EINVAL;
- if (yes > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct crush_rule_step))
+ if (yes > (ULONG_MAX - sizeof(*r))
+ / sizeof(struct crush_rule_step))
goto bad;
#endif
r = c->rules[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(*r) +