During an earlier cleanup, we lost the serialization
of multiple spu_run calls performed on the same
spu_context. In order to get this back, introduce a
mutex in the spu_context that is held inside of spu_run.
Noticed by Al Viro.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
spin_lock_init(&ctx->mmio_lock);
kref_init(&ctx->kref);
init_rwsem(&ctx->state_sema);
+ init_MUTEX(&ctx->run_sema);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->ibox_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wbox_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->stop_wq);
{
int ret;
- if ((ret = spu_run_init(ctx, npc, status)) != 0)
- return ret;
+ if (down_interruptible(&ctx->run_sema))
+ return -ERESTARTSYS;
+
+ ret = spu_run_init(ctx, npc, status);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
do {
ret = spufs_wait(ctx->stop_wq, spu_stopped(ctx, status));
break;
if (unlikely(ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)) {
ret = spu_reacquire_runnable(ctx, npc, status);
- if (ret) {
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
continue;
}
ret = spu_process_events(ctx);
ret = *status;
spu_yield(ctx);
+out:
+ up(&ctx->run_sema);
return ret;
}
enum { SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE, SPU_STATE_SAVED } state;
struct rw_semaphore state_sema;
+ struct semaphore run_sema;
struct mm_struct *owner;