perf probe: Clean up probe_point_lazy_walker() return value

Newer compilers (gcc 4.6) complains about:

        return ret < 0 ?: 0;

For the following reason:

  util/probe-finder.c: In function ‘probe_point_lazy_walker’:
  util/probe-finder.c:1331:18: error: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ‘true’, suggest explicit middle operand [-Werror=parentheses]

And indeed the return value is a somewhat obscure (but correct) value
of 'true', so return 'ret' instead - this is cleaner and unconfuses
GCC as well.

Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index 17f9c4a66ddd3575f6ea6de65bfbf6e4748b04a4..194f9e2a328575ed8fc9bf406bd3f82a667f6c0a 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static int probe_point_lazy_walker(const char *fname, int lineno,
         * Continue if no error, because the lazy pattern will match
         * to other lines
         */
-       return ret < 0 ?: 0;
+       return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
 }
 
 /* Find probe points from lazy pattern  */