As I was looking over the get_sb() changes, I stumbled across a little
mistake in the documentation updates. Unless we're getting into an
interesting new object-oriented realm, I doubt that get_sb() should really
return "struct int"...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
--------------------------- file_system_type ---------------------------
prototypes:
- struct int (*get_sb) (struct file_system_type *, int,
- const char *, void *, struct vfsmount *);
+ int (*get_sb) (struct file_system_type *, int,
+ const char *, void *, struct vfsmount *);
void (*kill_sb) (struct super_block *);
locking rules:
may block BKL
struct file_system_type {
const char *name;
int fs_flags;
- struct int (*get_sb) (struct file_system_type *, int,
- const char *, void *, struct vfsmount *);
+ int (*get_sb) (struct file_system_type *, int,
+ const char *, void *, struct vfsmount *);
void (*kill_sb) (struct super_block *);
struct module *owner;
struct file_system_type * next;