dlm: don't do pointless NULL check, use kzalloc and fix order of arguments
authorJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:54:31 +0000 (22:54 +0200)
committerDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:39:42 +0000 (08:39 -0500)
In fs/dlm/lock.c in the dlm_scan_waiters() function there are 3 small
issues:

1) There's no need to test the return value of the allocation and do a
memset if is succeedes. Just use kzalloc() to obtain zeroed memory.

2) Since kfree() handles NULL pointers gracefully, the test of
'warned' against NULL before the kfree() after the loop is completely
pointless. Remove it.

3) The arguments to kmalloc() (now kzalloc()) were swapped. Thanks to
Dr. David Alan Gilbert for pointing this out.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
fs/dlm/lock.c

index f71d0b5abd954db4dee39e5288c7835584f0cc36..84c52e6b8810fd857d86232cd6a1d0e89f01a1be 100644 (file)
@@ -849,9 +849,7 @@ void dlm_scan_waiters(struct dlm_ls *ls)
 
                if (!num_nodes) {
                        num_nodes = ls->ls_num_nodes;
-                       warned = kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL, num_nodes * sizeof(int));
-                       if (warned)
-                               memset(warned, 0, num_nodes * sizeof(int));
+                       warned = kzalloc(num_nodes * sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
                }
                if (!warned)
                        continue;
@@ -863,9 +861,7 @@ void dlm_scan_waiters(struct dlm_ls *ls)
                          dlm_config.ci_waitwarn_us, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid);
        }
        mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
-
-       if (warned)
-               kfree(warned);
+       kfree(warned);
 
        if (debug_expired)
                log_debug(ls, "scan_waiters %u warn %u over %d us max %lld us",