UBIFS: nuke pdflush from comments

The pdflush thread is long gone, so this patch removes references to pdflush
from UBIFS comments.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
index 35389ca2d267093895681dc0f01dfa1e5f577d79..7bd6e72afd1136a3141e42227553ba5daa5ffcba 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@ -37,11 +37,11 @@
  *
  * A thing to keep in mind: inode @i_mutex is locked in most VFS operations we
  * implement. However, this is not true for 'ubifs_writepage()', which may be
- * called with @i_mutex unlocked. For example, when pdflush is doing background
- * write-back, it calls 'ubifs_writepage()' with unlocked @i_mutex. At "normal"
- * work-paths the @i_mutex is locked in 'ubifs_writepage()', e.g. in the
- * "sys_write -> alloc_pages -> direct reclaim path". So, in 'ubifs_writepage()'
- * we are only guaranteed that the page is locked.
+ * called with @i_mutex unlocked. For example, when flusher thread is doing
+ * background write-back, it calls 'ubifs_writepage()' with unlocked @i_mutex.
+ * At "normal" work-paths the @i_mutex is locked in 'ubifs_writepage()', e.g.
+ * in the "sys_write -> alloc_pages -> direct reclaim path". So, in
+ * 'ubifs_writepage()' we are only guaranteed that the page is locked.
  *
  * Similarly, @i_mutex is not always locked in 'ubifs_readpage()', e.g., the
  * read-ahead path does not lock it ("sys_read -> generic_file_aio_read ->

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index 1c766c39c03819b4d088f19f0215c63a89f2b539..c3fa6c5327a3bb7b6939206c118a9d6ace0ee039 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int ubifs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
        mutex_lock(&ui->ui_mutex);
        /*
         * Due to races between write-back forced by budgeting
-        * (see 'sync_some_inodes()') and pdflush write-back, the inode may
+        * (see 'sync_some_inodes()') and background write-back, the inode may
         * have already been synchronized, do not do this again. This might
         * also happen if it was synchronized in an VFS operation, e.g.
         * 'ubifs_link()'.