In the case of ((max9877_regs[reg] >> shift) & mask) != val
but ((max9877_regs[reg2] >> shift) & mask) == val2,
current code does not update the registers.
Fix the logic to update registers if either val or val2 is changed.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
unsigned int mask = mc->max;
unsigned int val = (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] & mask);
unsigned int val2 = (ucontrol->value.integer.value[1] & mask);
- unsigned int change = 1;
+ unsigned int change = 0;
- if (((max9877_regs[reg] >> shift) & mask) == val)
- change = 0;
+ if (((max9877_regs[reg] >> shift) & mask) != val)
+ change = 1;
- if (((max9877_regs[reg2] >> shift) & mask) == val2)
- change = 0;
+ if (((max9877_regs[reg2] >> shift) & mask) != val2)
+ change = 1;
if (change) {
max9877_regs[reg] &= ~(mask << shift);