Replace a complex if->continue->else->break construction in
i40e_next_filter. We can simply use hlist_for_each_entry_continue
instead. This drops a lot of confusing code. The resulting code is much
easier to understand the intention, and follows the more normal pattern
for using hlist loops. We could have also used a break with a "return
next" at the end of the function, instead of return NULL, but the
current implementation is explicitly clear that when you reach the end
of the loop you get a NULL value. The alternative construction is less
clear since the reader would have to know that next is NULL at the end
of the loop.
Change-Id: Ife74ca451dd79d7f0d93c672bd42092d324d4a03
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
static
struct i40e_new_mac_filter *i40e_next_filter(struct i40e_new_mac_filter *next)
{
- while (next) {
- next = hlist_entry(next->hlist.next,
- typeof(struct i40e_new_mac_filter),
- hlist);
-
- /* keep going if we found a broadcast filter */
- if (next && is_broadcast_ether_addr(next->f->macaddr))
- continue;
-
- break;
+ hlist_for_each_entry_continue(next, hlist) {
+ if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(next->f->macaddr))
+ return next;
}
- return next;
+ return NULL;
}
/**