The value resulting from the SECCOMP_RET_DATA mask could exceed MAX_ERRNO
when setting errno during a SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO filter action. This makes
sure we have a reliable value being set, so that an invalid errno will not
be ignored by userspace.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
switch (action) {
case SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO:
- /* Set the low-order 16-bits as a errno. */
+ /* Set low-order bits as an errno, capped at MAX_ERRNO. */
+ if (data > MAX_ERRNO)
+ data = MAX_ERRNO;
syscall_set_return_value(current, task_pt_regs(current),
-data, 0);
goto skip;