sched, tracing: Show PREEMPT_ACTIVE state in trace_sched_switch

We had need to see the difference between scheduling a runnable task and
a runnable task being involuntarily preempted.

No app should rely on the old string output (the binary
trace event record format is not changed).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1316164603.10174.11.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index f6334782a593847907b82fcfc5756040b1bd6ff8..959ff18b63b626497764aec8dd16665fce63c0ab 100644 (file)
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(struct task_struct *p)
         * For all intents and purposes a preempted task is a running task.
         */
        if (task_thread_info(p)->preempt_count & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)
-               state = TASK_RUNNING;
+               state = TASK_RUNNING | TASK_STATE_MAX;
 #endif
 
        return state;
@@ -137,13 +137,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                __entry->next_prio      = next->prio;
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s ==> next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d",
+       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d",
                __entry->prev_comm, __entry->prev_pid, __entry->prev_prio,
-               __entry->prev_state ?
-                 __print_flags(__entry->prev_state, "|",
+               __entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX-1) ?
+                 __print_flags(__entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX-1), "|",
                                { 1, "S"} , { 2, "D" }, { 4, "T" }, { 8, "t" },
                                { 16, "Z" }, { 32, "X" }, { 64, "x" },
                                { 128, "W" }) : "R",
+               __entry->prev_state & TASK_STATE_MAX ? "+" : "",
                __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio)
 );