sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend
authorOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Mon, 4 May 2015 10:09:36 +0000 (03:09 -0700)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Fri, 8 May 2015 09:53:56 +0000 (11:53 +0200)
Commit 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in
cpuset_cpu_inactive()"), a SCHED_DEADLINE bugfix, had a logic error that
caused a regression in setting a CPU inactive during suspend. I ran into
this when a program was failing pthread_setaffinity_np() with EINVAL after
a suspend+wake up.

A simple reproducer:

$ ./a.out
sched_setaffinity: Success
$ systemctl suspend
$ ./a.out
sched_setaffinity: Invalid argument

... where ./a.out is:

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <errno.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int main(void)
{
long num_cores;
cpu_set_t cpu_set;
int ret;

num_cores = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set);
CPU_SET(num_cores - 1, &cpu_set);
errno = 0;
ret = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(cpu_set), &cpu_set);
perror("sched_setaffinity");
return ret ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

The mistake is that suspend is handled in the action ==
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN case of the switch statement in
cpuset_cpu_inactive().

However, the commit in question masked out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN
from the action, making this case dead.

The fix is straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1cb5ecb3d6543c38cce5790387f336f54ec8e2bc.1430733960.git.osandov@osandov.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/sched/core.c

index 34db9bf892a3921e1862c1479d129797842d10c6..57bd333bc4ab3e070356e7a3b9b9b2a5e742c91f 100644 (file)
@@ -6999,27 +6999,23 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
        unsigned long flags;
        long cpu = (long)hcpu;
        struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+       bool overflow;
+       int cpus;
 
-       switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+       switch (action) {
        case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-               /* explicitly allow suspend */
-               if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
-                       bool overflow;
-                       int cpus;
-
-                       rcu_read_lock_sched();
-                       dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+               rcu_read_lock_sched();
+               dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
 
-                       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-                       cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
-                       overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
-                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+               cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
+               overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
+               raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 
-                       rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+               rcu_read_unlock_sched();
 
-                       if (overflow)
-                               return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
-               }
+               if (overflow)
+                       return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
                cpuset_update_active_cpus(false);
                break;
        case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN: