locking/lockdep: Mark __lockdep_count_forward_deps() as static
authorFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:55:35 +0000 (00:55 +0800)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:50:17 +0000 (13:50 +0100)
There are new Sparse warnings:

  >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1235:15: sparse: symbol '__lockdep_count_forward_deps' was not declared. Should it be static?
  >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1261:15: sparse: symbol '__lockdep_count_backward_deps' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please consider folding the attached diff :-)

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/527d1787.ThzXGoUspZWehFDl\%fengguang.wu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/locking/lockdep.c

index 4e8e14c34e428d6a75580ec862c4975b0425dfc0..576ba756a32d9c80948c72e31700738bcfc5ee06 100644 (file)
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int noop_count(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
        return 0;
 }
 
-unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
+static unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
 {
        unsigned long  count = 0;
        struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
        return ret;
 }
 
-unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
+static unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
 {
        unsigned long  count = 0;
        struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);