Add back FAIR_SLEEPERS and GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS.
FAIR_SLEEPERS is the old logic: credit sleepers with their sleep time.
GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dampens this a bit: 50% of their sleep time gets
credited.
The hope here is to still give the benefits of fair-sleepers logic
(quick wakeups, etc.) while not allow them to have 100% of their
sleep time as if they were running.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
if (!initial) {
/* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */
- if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
+ if (sched_feat(FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
unsigned long thresh = sysctl_sched_latency;
/*
task_of(se)->policy != SCHED_IDLE))
thresh = calc_delta_fair(thresh, se);
+ /*
+ * Halve their sleep time's effect, to allow
+ * for a gentler effect of sleepers:
+ */
+ if (sched_feat(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS))
+ thresh >>= 1;
+
vruntime -= thresh;
}
}
* considers the task to be running during that period. This gives it
* a service deficit on wakeup, allowing it to run sooner.
*/
-SCHED_FEAT(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 0)
+SCHED_FEAT(FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
+
+/*
+ * Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
+ * them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to
+ * rip the spread apart.
+ */
+SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
/*
* By not normalizing the sleep time, heavy tasks get an effective