SM501: Fix sm501_init_reg() mask/set order
authorBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:16:29 +0000 (17:16 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:59:11 +0000 (08:59 -0700)
The order of the set and mask operation in sm501_init_reg() was setting and
then masking the bits set.  Correct the order so that we do not end up with
288MHz SDRAM clocks on certain systems.

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
drivers/mfd/sm501.c

index 4c4412e0de24e429b6a703d8c423cd1cb2944e1b..3a0ecfc404e95497e4fff9ede0e2b15db0bcadfa 100644 (file)
@@ -813,6 +813,9 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(dbg_regs, 0666, sm501_dbg_regs, NULL);
 /* sm501_init_reg
  *
  * Helper function for the init code to setup a register
+ *
+ * clear the bits which are set in r->mask, and then set
+ * the bits set in r->set.
 */
 
 static inline void sm501_init_reg(struct sm501_devdata *sm,
@@ -822,8 +825,8 @@ static inline void sm501_init_reg(struct sm501_devdata *sm,
        unsigned long tmp;
 
        tmp = readl(sm->regs + reg);
-       tmp |= r->set;
        tmp &= ~r->mask;
+       tmp |= r->set;
        writel(tmp, sm->regs + reg);
 }