writeback: remove the internal 5% low bound on dirty_ratio
authorWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:21:45 +0000 (14:21 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:52:08 +0000 (16:52 -0700)
The dirty_ratio was silently limited in global_dirty_limits() to >= 5%.
This is not a user expected behavior.  And it's inconsistent with
calc_period_shift(), which uses the plain vm_dirty_ratio value.

Let's remove the internal bound.

At the same time, fix balance_dirty_pages() to work with the
dirty_thresh=0 case.  This allows applications to proceed when
dirty+writeback pages are all cleaned.

And ">" fits with the name "exceeded" better than ">=" does.  Neil thinks
it is an aesthetic improvement as well as a functional one :)

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Proposed-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fs/fs-writeback.c
mm/page-writeback.c

index ab38fef1c9a1a52eab7128fa6a7dad217d4ad744..97d2951bd4d12ef26c331b88f5fb03554f90a470 100644 (file)
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static inline bool over_bground_thresh(void)
        global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
 
        return (global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
-               global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) >= background_thresh);
+               global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) > background_thresh);
 }
 
 /*
index 4dd91f7fd39f8c5321546c3e4cd3f2b730404b82..b840afa89761ce0d83690ff963385399246fa6d8 100644 (file)
@@ -415,14 +415,8 @@ void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
 
        if (vm_dirty_bytes)
                dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
-       else {
-               int dirty_ratio;
-
-               dirty_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
-               if (dirty_ratio < 5)
-                       dirty_ratio = 5;
-               dirty = (dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
-       }
+       else
+               dirty = (vm_dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
 
        if (dirty_background_bytes)
                background = DIV_ROUND_UP(dirty_background_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -510,7 +504,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
                 * catch-up. This avoids (excessively) small writeouts
                 * when the bdi limits are ramping up.
                 */
-               if (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback <
+               if (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback <=
                                (background_thresh + dirty_thresh) / 2)
                        break;
 
@@ -542,8 +536,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
                 * the last resort safeguard.
                 */
                dirty_exceeded =
-                       (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback >= bdi_thresh)
-                       || (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback >= dirty_thresh);
+                       (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback > bdi_thresh)
+                       || (nr_reclaimable + nr_writeback > dirty_thresh);
 
                if (!dirty_exceeded)
                        break;