Write back inode data pages even when the inode itself is locked
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:53:20 +0000 (12:53 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:53:20 +0000 (12:53 -0800)
In __writeback_single_inode(), when we find a locked inode and we're not
doing a data-integrity sync, we used to just skip writing entirely,
since we didn't want to wait for the inode to unlock.

However, there's really no reason to skip writing the data pages, which
are likely to be the the bulk of the dirty state anyway (and the main
reason why writeback was started for the non-data-integrity case, of
course!)

Acked-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fs/fs-writeback.c

index c403b66ec83c6525532c25decbe923c32356649b..a4b142a6a2c7f4c870a322bf9d3c9d00be1e8a5f 100644 (file)
@@ -251,8 +251,19 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
                WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
 
        if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_LOCK)) {
+               struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+               int ret;
+
                list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_dirty);
-               return 0;
+
+               /*
+                * Even if we don't actually write the inode itself here,
+                * we can at least start some of the data writeout..
+                */
+               spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+               ret = do_writepages(mapping, wbc);
+               spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+               return ret;
        }
 
        /*