[media] v4l2-async: failing functions shouldn't have side effects

v4l2-async had several functions doing some operations and then
not undoing the operations in a failure situation. For example,
v4l2_async_test_notify() moved a subdev into notifier's done list
even if registering the subdev (v4l2_device_register_subdev) failed.
If the subdev was allocated and v4l2_async_register_subdev() called
from the driver's probe() function, as usually, the probe()
function freed the allocated subdev and returned a failure.
Nevertheless, the subdev was still left into the notifier's done
list, causing an access to already freed memory when the notifier
was later unregistered.

A hand-edited call trace leaving freed subdevs into the notifier:

v4l2_async_register_notifier(notifier, asd)
cameradrv_probe
 sd = devm_kzalloc()
 v4l2_async_register_subdev(sd)
  v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd)
   list_move(sd, &notifier->done)
   v4l2_device_register_subdev(notifier->v4l2_dev, sd)
    cameradrv_registered(sd) -> fails
->v4l2_async_register_subdev returns failure
->cameradrv_probe returns failure
->devres frees the allocated sd
->sd was freed but it still remains in the notifier's list.

This patch fixes this and several other cases where a failing
function could leave nodes into a linked list while the caller
might free the node due to a failure.

Signed-off-by: Tuukka Toivonen <tuukka.toivonen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>

diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index 61813508954891baa08383f27927482ab01a6e18..96cc733f35ef72b0f8280f8ff30e0beaedf6d222 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -100,18 +100,11 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
 {
        int ret;
 
-       /* Remove from the waiting list */
-       list_del(&asd->list);
-       sd->asd = asd;
-       sd->notifier = notifier;
-
        if (notifier->bound) {
                ret = notifier->bound(notifier, sd, asd);
                if (ret < 0)
                        return ret;
        }
-       /* Move from the global subdevice list to notifier's done */
-       list_move(&sd->async_list, &notifier->done);
 
        ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev(notifier->v4l2_dev, sd);
        if (ret < 0) {
@@ -120,6 +113,14 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
                return ret;
        }
 
+       /* Remove from the waiting list */
+       list_del(&asd->list);
+       sd->asd = asd;
+       sd->notifier = notifier;
+
+       /* Move from the global subdevice list to notifier's done */
+       list_move(&sd->async_list, &notifier->done);
+
        if (list_empty(&notifier->waiting) && notifier->complete)
                return notifier->complete(notifier);
 
@@ -169,9 +170,6 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
 
        mutex_lock(&list_lock);
 
-       /* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
-       list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
-
        list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, &subdev_list, async_list) {
                int ret;
 
@@ -186,6 +184,9 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
                }
        }
 
+       /* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
+       list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
+
        mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
 
        return 0;