locks: clean up comment typo
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:13:06 +0000 (12:13 -0500)
committerJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:24:42 +0000 (08:24 -0400)
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
fs/locks.c

index 2cfeea622f28de2780690396e2f71cd09630a9a0..5e28612120c2c370127ff8b60dad8e0fb25df001 100644 (file)
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
  * it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
  *
  * Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
- * list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the
+ * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
  * i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
  * in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.
  */