Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
* it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
*
* Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
- * list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the
+ * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
* i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
* in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.
*/