While chasing a regression I noticed we potentially patch the wrong
code in native_patch().
If we do not select the native code sequence, we must use the default
patcher, not fall-through the switch case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Fixes:
3cded4179481 ("x86/paravirt: Optimize native pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161208154349.270616999@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
end = end_pv_lock_ops_queued_spin_unlock;
goto patch_site;
}
+ goto patch_default;
+
case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted):
if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted()) {
start = start_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
end = end_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
goto patch_site;
}
+ goto patch_default;
#endif
default:
+patch_default:
ret = paravirt_patch_default(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
break;
end = end_pv_lock_ops_queued_spin_unlock;
goto patch_site;
}
+ goto patch_default;
+
case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted):
if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted()) {
start = start_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
end = end_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
goto patch_site;
}
+ goto patch_default;
#endif
default:
+patch_default:
ret = paravirt_patch_default(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
break;