This reverts commit
c38446cc65e1f2b3eb8630c53943b94c4f65f670.
Before the commit, the code makes senses to me but not after the commit.
The "nr_reclaimed" is the number of pages reclaimed by scanning through
the memcg's lru lists. The "nr_to_reclaim" is the target value for the
whole function. For example, we like to early break the reclaim if
reclaimed 32 pages under direct reclaim (not DEF_PRIORITY).
After the reverted commit, the target "nr_to_reclaim" is decremented each
time by "nr_reclaimed" but we still use it to compare the "nr_reclaimed".
It just doesn't make sense to me...
Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
* freeing target can get unreasonably large.
*/
- if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim)
- nr_to_reclaim = 0;
- else
- nr_to_reclaim -= nr_reclaimed;
-
- if (!nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim && priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
break;
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);