The NULL in mm_match_cgroup() comes from a possibly exiting mm->owner. It
makes a lot more sense to check where it's looked up, rather than check
for it in __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree() where it's unexpected.
No other callsite passes NULL to __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
bool mm_match_cgroup(const struct mm_struct *mm, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct mem_cgroup *task_memcg;
- bool match;
+ bool match = false;
rcu_read_lock();
task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
- match = __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(memcg, task_memcg);
+ if (task_memcg)
+ match = __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(memcg, task_memcg);
rcu_read_unlock();
return match;
}
{
if (root_memcg == memcg)
return true;
- if (!root_memcg->use_hierarchy || !memcg)
+ if (!root_memcg->use_hierarchy)
return false;
return cgroup_is_descendant(memcg->css.cgroup, root_memcg->css.cgroup);
}