At present, the same warning message can be output twice when nilfs
detected a problem on super blocks:
NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
...
This is because these super blocks are reloaded with the block size
written in a super block if it differs from the first block size, but
this repetition looks somewhat confusing. So, we hint at what is
going on by appending block size information to those messages.
Reported-by: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
return -EIO;
}
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "NILFS warning: unable to read primary superblock\n");
- } else if (!sbp[1])
+ "NILFS warning: unable to read primary superblock "
+ "(blocksize = %d)\n", blocksize);
+ } else if (!sbp[1]) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
- "NILFS warning: unable to read secondary superblock\n");
+ "NILFS warning: unable to read secondary superblock "
+ "(blocksize = %d)\n", blocksize);
+ }
/*
* Compare two super blocks and set 1 in swp if the secondary
if (!valid[!swp])
printk(KERN_WARNING "NILFS warning: broken superblock. "
- "using spare superblock.\n");
+ "using spare superblock (blocksize = %d).\n", blocksize);
if (swp)
nilfs_swap_super_block(nilfs);