Change in handling of the regulator description means that static
checkers correctly assume we could be using dereferenced pointer to the
regulator. In reality we will never get the -ENODEV error, as current
behavior flow does not predict it, because:
If the device tree or board file does not define suitable regulators for
the component, it will be substituted by a dummy regulator, or, if
regulators are disabled altogether, by stubs.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
/* Enable attached regulator if any. */
st->vdd = devm_regulator_get(indio_dev->dev.parent, "vdd");
- if (!IS_ERR(st->vdd)) {
- ret = regulator_enable(st->vdd);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(indio_dev->dev.parent,
- "failed to enable Vdd supply: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
- } else {
- ret = PTR_ERR(st->vdd);
- if (ret != -ENODEV)
- return ret;
+ if (IS_ERR(st->vdd))
+ return PTR_ERR(st->vdd);
+
+ ret = regulator_enable(st->vdd);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(indio_dev->dev.parent,
+ "failed to enable Vdd supply: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
}
ret = ms5611_reset(indio_dev);