timekeeping: Add missing update call in timekeeping_resume()

The leap second rework unearthed another issue of inconsistent data.

On timekeeping_resume() the timekeeper data is updated, but nothing
calls timekeeping_update(), so now the update code in the timer
interrupt sees stale values.

This has been the case before those changes, but then the timer
interrupt was using stale data as well so this went unnoticed for quite
some time.

Add the missing update call, so all the data is consistent everywhere.

Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 269b1fe5f2ae2f7e6c0bb0fac8ce9a54e2d4d278..3447cfaf11e7d61b11d30bc063967e47d85e59d4 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
        timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock);
        timekeeper.ntp_error = 0;
        timekeeping_suspended = 0;
+       timekeeping_update(false);
        write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
 
        touch_softlockup_watchdog();