Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431441711-29753-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
* Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
*/
-#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
+#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0)
/*
* Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():