This lockdep splat was being triggered on umount:
[55715.973122] ===============================
[55715.980169] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[55715.981021]
4.3.0-11553-g8d3de01-dirty #15 Tainted: G W
[55715.982353] -------------------------------
[55715.983301] fs/gfs2/glock.c:1427 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
The code it refers to is the rht_for_each_entry_safe usage in
glock_hash_walk. The condition that triggers the warning is
lockdep_rht_bucket_is_held(tbl, hash) which is checked in the
__rcu_dereference_protected macro.
The rhashtable buckets are not changed in glock_hash_walk so it's safe
to rely on the rcu protection. Replace the rht_for_each_entry_safe()
usage with rht_for_each_entry_rcu(), which doesn't care whether the
bucket lock is held if the rcu read lock is held.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
static void glock_hash_walk(glock_examiner examiner, const struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
{
struct gfs2_glock *gl;
- struct rhash_head *pos, *next;
+ struct rhash_head *pos;
const struct bucket_table *tbl;
int i;
rcu_read_lock();
tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(gl_hash_table.tbl, &gl_hash_table);
for (i = 0; i < tbl->size; i++) {
- rht_for_each_entry_safe(gl, pos, next, tbl, i, gl_node) {
+ rht_for_each_entry_rcu(gl, pos, tbl, i, gl_node) {
if ((gl->gl_name.ln_sbd == sdp) &&
lockref_get_not_dead(&gl->gl_lockref))
examiner(gl);