Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values
of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@
(
sip.sin_family ==
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !=
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
state_set(&child_ep->com, CONNECTING);
child_ep->com.tdev = tdev;
child_ep->com.cm_id = NULL;
- child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
+ child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_port = req->local_port;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->local_ip;
- child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
+ child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_port = req->peer_port;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->peer_ip;
get_ep(&parent_ep->com);