There is a problem in the dwarf-regs.c files for sh, sparc and x86 where
it is possible to make an out-of-bounds array access when searching for
register names.
This patch fixes it by replacing '<=' to '<', so when register (number
== XXX_MAX_REGS), get_arch_regstr() will return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@huawei.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441078184-105038-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
/* Return architecture dependent register string (for kprobe-tracer) */
const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n)
{
- return (n <= SH_MAX_REGS) ? sh_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+ return (n < SH_MAX_REGS) ? sh_regs_table[n] : NULL;
}
*/
const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n)
{
- return (n <= SPARC_MAX_REGS) ? sparc_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+ return (n < SPARC_MAX_REGS) ? sparc_regs_table[n] : NULL;
}
/* Return architecture dependent register string (for kprobe-tracer) */
const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n)
{
- return (n <= ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n] : NULL;
+ return (n < ARCH_MAX_REGS) ? arch_regs_table[n] : NULL;
}