The original conditions are always true. I think && was intended here,
but I don't have the hardware to test. Could you take a look?
kvalo: Chilam confirmed that the fix is valid
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
u32 txb_mask;
u8 ac = WMM_NUM_AC;
- if ((HTC_CTRL_RSVD_SVC != endpoint->svc_id) ||
+ if ((HTC_CTRL_RSVD_SVC != endpoint->svc_id) &&
(WMI_CONTROL_SVC != endpoint->svc_id))
ac = target->dev->ar->ep2ac_map[endpoint->eid];
*/
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&txq);
- if ((HTC_CTRL_RSVD_SVC != endpoint->svc_id) ||
+ if ((HTC_CTRL_RSVD_SVC != endpoint->svc_id) &&
(WMI_CONTROL_SVC != endpoint->svc_id))
ac = target->dev->ar->ep2ac_map[endpoint->eid];