};
int aa_map_resource(int resource);
-int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, unsigned int resource,
- struct rlimit *new_rlim);
+int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, struct task_struct *,
+ unsigned int resource, struct rlimit *new_rlim);
void __aa_transition_rlimits(struct aa_profile *old, struct aa_profile *new);
int error = 0;
if (!unconfined(profile))
- error = aa_task_setrlimit(profile, resource, new_rlim);
+ error = aa_task_setrlimit(profile, task, resource, new_rlim);
return error;
}
/**
* aa_task_setrlimit - test permission to set an rlimit
* @profile - profile confining the task (NOT NULL)
+ * @task - task the resource is being set on
* @resource - the resource being set
* @new_rlim - the new resource limit (NOT NULL)
*
*
* Returns: 0 or error code if setting resource failed
*/
-int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, unsigned int resource,
- struct rlimit *new_rlim)
+int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, struct task_struct *task,
+ unsigned int resource, struct rlimit *new_rlim)
{
int error = 0;
- if (profile->rlimits.mask & (1 << resource) &&
- new_rlim->rlim_max > profile->rlimits.limits[resource].rlim_max)
-
- error = audit_resource(profile, resource, new_rlim->rlim_max,
- -EACCES);
+ /* TODO: extend resource control to handle other (non current)
+ * processes. AppArmor rules currently have the implicit assumption
+ * that the task is setting the resource of the current process
+ */
+ if ((task != current->group_leader) ||
+ (profile->rlimits.mask & (1 << resource) &&
+ new_rlim->rlim_max > profile->rlimits.limits[resource].rlim_max))
+ error = -EACCES;
- return error;
+ return audit_resource(profile, resource, new_rlim->rlim_max, error);
}
/**