We recently added a check to see if nla_nest_start() fails. There are
two issues with that. First, if it fails then I don't think we should
call nla_nest_cancel(). Second, it's slightly convoluted but the
current code returns success but we should return -EMSGSIZE instead.
Fixes:
a50fe0ffd76f ("lwtunnel: check return value of nla_nest_start")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
{
const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *ops;
struct nlattr *nest;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
+ int ret;
if (!lwtstate)
return 0;
lwtstate->type > LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX)
return 0;
- ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
nest = nla_nest_start(skb, RTA_ENCAP);
if (!nest)
- goto nla_put_failure;
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
rcu_read_lock();
ops = rcu_dereference(lwtun_encaps[lwtstate->type]);
if (likely(ops && ops->fill_encap))